{
  "title": "Signal Room",
  "subtitle": "A field guide to AI in the everyday",
  "sample_size": 95,
  "unit": "reviewed request messages",
  "themes": [
    {
      "label": "Evidence & research",
      "count": 29
    },
    {
      "label": "Reading & interpretation",
      "count": 22
    },
    {
      "label": "Clinical concepts",
      "count": 20
    },
    {
      "label": "Wound-care learning",
      "count": 13
    },
    {
      "label": "Medicines & guidance",
      "count": 11
    }
  ],
  "intents": [
    {
      "label": "Explain",
      "count": 24
    },
    {
      "label": "Interpret",
      "count": 17
    },
    {
      "label": "Find evidence",
      "count": 16
    },
    {
      "label": "Synthesise",
      "count": 14
    },
    {
      "label": "Refine context",
      "count": 12
    },
    {
      "label": "Apply & compare",
      "count": 12
    }
  ],
  "methodology": {
    "scope": "A manually coded, non-exhaustive sample of request messages from one shared conversation. Not an all-time usage report.",
    "selection": "Recent messages plus targeted archive searches; selection favours retrievable topics. Shares describe this reviewed sample only.",
    "counting": "Each coded message is counted once, including brief follow-ups and image requests whose broad context is explicit in surrounding text. One exact repeated request was deduplicated. Context-free attachments were excluded. Assistant replies and other participants were excluded.",
    "coding": "One primary workflow and one primary request intent per message; manual classification is approximate.",
    "privacy": "Only broad aggregate categories are published. No names, quotes, chat identifiers, dates, times, photos, clinical findings, patient details or individual records. No analytics or live chat connection.",
    "limits": "No patient counts, diagnostic accuracy, time savings, money saved or clinical outcomes can be inferred from these messages.",
    "refresh": "Static editorial snapshot; not a live feed."
  },
  "insights": [
    {
      "title": "The workbench is a library first",
      "text": "Evidence & research is the largest workflow in this sample: 29 of 95 reviewed request messages. Topic selection affects the ranking."
    },
    {
      "title": "Reading is a recurring job",
      "text": "Reading & interpretation accounts for 22 reviewed messages. The observable use is explanation and interpretation support\u2014not independently verified decisions."
    },
    {
      "title": "Not just search",
      "text": "14 messages ask for synthesis, while 12 add or correct context. Iteration is visible; the benefit or correctness is not measured."
    },
    {
      "title": "Five jobs, one workspace",
      "text": "The review spans 5 broad workflows and 6 request intents. This is a view of how questions are asked, not a scorecard for clinical performance."
    }
  ]
}